Useful Links

On-Line Tools

PHS and NSF (Federal) Policies

References

Requirements

Effective October 1, 1995, in accordance with PHS, NSF, and UC policies, Investigators submitting proposals to the NSF and the PHS (including the National Institutes of Health) must disclose their project-related financial or management interests prior to any expenditure of awarded funds and as changes in the interest(s) occur, or on an annual basis, whichever comes first. "Investigators" are those individuals with responsibility for the design, conduct, or reporting of research. Disclosure is to include all Significant and Related Interests cumulative for the investigator, his/her spouse, and dependent children. Also, please note in the case of subcontractors, NSF requires each grantee institution employing more than fifty persons to maintain an appropriate written and enforced policy on conflict of interest.

As a streamlining measure implemented at UCI in May 1998, the PI is required to disclose at the time of proposal submission. Other investigators must disclose when an award is made. It is the responsibility of the PI to ensure that a review by the Conflict of Interest Oversight Committee is completed on any positive disclosures prior to the expenditure of funds.

Significant Interest

However, a "Significant Financial Interest" is not disclosed if it originates from the following:

Related Interest

A related interest occurs when the investigator has Significant Financial Interests that would reasonably appear to be affected by the federally funded research or in entities whose financial interests would reasonably appear to be affected by the research. The UC campuses have interpreted "relatedness" to be broadly defined. Thus, consulting in one's field of expertise will automatically mandate disclosure. Also, equity holdings, consulting, or management positions in any start up technology company will also trigger conflict of interest review.

Examples include situations where the investigator:

COIOC Considerations for Review

The COIOC will consider the research project according to traditionally held principles of ethical conduct and academic freedom. The COIOC will evaluate whether: there is sufficient separation of University and private interests, the proposed research is appropriate to the University, the teaching and research environment is open, freedom to publish and to disseminate research results is preserved, the University's rights are protected, the University's facilities and resources are used appropriately, and that the University receives proper compensation for their use.

Considerations for Review Relating to Human Subjects

The COIOC must consider the effect of the disclosed financial interests on the rights and welfare of the participants. The COIOC must consider whether the rights of the participants would be better protected by reduction or disclosure of a financial interest, separation of responsibilities for financial and research decisions, additional oversight, elimination of a financial interest, implementation of an independent data and monitoring committee, modification of roles in research staff, or any other mechanism which would mitigate effects of the financial interest."

Final COIOC approval is conditioned upon the Institutional Review Board's review of the COIOC findings and communication from the IRB that the COIOC has adequately considered the effect of the disclosed financial interests on the rights and welfare of the participants.

For more information, visit Procedures for Federal Financial Disclosure.